Anatomy of a Hustle

Anatomy of a Hustle

Anatomy of a Hustle

Abstract red glowing lines on a dark background
Abstract red glowing lines on a dark background
Abstract red glowing lines on a dark background

In 1981 two Brothers took on a Conspiracy that would reshape the world… and the future.

In 1981 two Brothers took on a Conspiracy that would reshape the world… and the future.

In 1981 two Brothers took on a Conspiracy that would reshape the world… and the future.

Anatomy of a Hustle the Series captures the political betrayal and constitutional crisis of the True Story depicted in the best selling book of the same name.

Learn More


In the matter Preferred Communications Inc. v. City of Los Angeles.


The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and later the U.S. Supreme Court found that the City of Los Angeles violated the First Amendment through its procedure relative to the South Central Los Angeles Cable Television Franchise specifically by depriving Preferred Communications Inc. access to the public utility lines.

Marshal would dismiss the case twice; and, twice, Marshall was reversed, in two higher courts. In sum, twelve senior members of the bench superseded Marshall's dismissal of the case; three judges from the 9th Circuit and nine justices in the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Ninth Circuit summarizes:   

"...[t]he complaint should not have been dismissed. The activities in which respondent allegedly seeks to engage plainly implicate First Amendment interests."

The most extensively documented, clear-cut, historical conspiracy

Elector of Injustice

In 1980, Senator Alan Cranston, from the State of California, nominated a judge who would in less than one year's time, preside over a trial centered upon the interests of his #1 campaign financeer.

In 1980, Senator Alan Cranston, from the State of California, nominated a judge who would in less than one year's time, preside over a trial centered upon the interests of his #1 campaign financeer.

In 1980, Senator Alan Cranston, from the State of California, nominated a judge who would in less than one year's time, preside over a trial centered upon the interests of his #1 campaign financeer.

The Business
Mastermind

The Business
Mastermind

The Business
Mastermind

Eli Broad from Kaufman and Broad or KB Home receives a cable franchise from his campaign finance recipeient — Mayor Tom Bradley.

Eli Broad from Kaufman and Broad or KB Home receives a cable franchise from his campaign finance recipeient — Mayor Tom Bradley.

Eli Broad from Kaufman and Broad or KB Home receives a cable franchise from his campaign finance recipeient — Mayor Tom Bradley.

The Public Servant
who Serves Himself

The Public Servant
who Serves Himself

The Public Servant
who Serves Himself

Mayor of Los Angeles, Tom Bradley, awards a monopoly franchise to his #1 campaign contributor and pushes the city council to block all competition from entering the market.

Mayor of Los Angeles, Tom Bradley, awards a monopoly franchise to his #1 campaign contributor and pushes the city council to block all competition from entering the market.

Mayor of Los Angeles, Tom Bradley, awards a monopoly franchise to his #1 campaign contributor and pushes the city council to block all competition from entering the market.

The Judge
without Honor

FFEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Consuelo Marshall, former city employee —nominated for her judgeship by the candidate whose campaign was led by the owner of the monopoly she upheld for a decade — defends the unconstitutional status quo for a decade while American Citizen's rights were (and continue to be) violated.

A monopoly sustained by a City in violation of the 1st amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America,.

FFEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Consuelo Marshall, former city employee —nominated for her judgeship by the candidate whose campaign was led by the owner of the monopoly she upheld for a decade — defends the unconstitutional status quo for a decade while American Citizen's rights were (and continue to be) violated.

A monopoly sustained by a City in violation of the 1st amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America,.

FFEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Consuelo Marshall, former city employee —nominated for her judgeship by the candidate whose campaign was led by the owner of the monopoly she upheld for a decade — defends the unconstitutional status quo for a decade while American Citizen's rights were (and continue to be) violated.

A monopoly sustained by a City in violation of the 1st amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America,.

Preview the Book and
Order on Amazon

Preview the Book and
Order on Amazon

Check out the Sneak Peek Interview of 'CableHeist'

Check out the Sneak Peek Interview of 'CableHeist'

The layers of Institutional Power begin to stack Sky high.

HEAR THE INTERVIEW

Abstract red glowing lines on a dark background
Abstract red glowing lines on a dark background
Abstract red glowing lines on a dark background